10 hours ago 11.50480 etnkD8JyFZ76bQd3S8wFt2N7M9Fp9oJVUFXQo4Zkg95F3X9VoXioHDeCXju7AzKevK7jERKj2XAhyKze6Sx1r2nj48jfWuLqsp

https://blockexplorer.electroneum.com/tx/cd1712cfd19252d6998c99b35d3e893cdc40dba1e4fdf8688bb090b5345ae37d

13 hours ago 18.95258 etnkD8JyFZ76bQd3S8wFt2N7M9Fp9oJVUFXQo4Zkg95F3X9VoXioHDeCXju7AzKevK7jERKj2XAhyKze6Sx1r2nj48jfWuLqsp

https://blockexplorer.electroneum.com/tx/3114dcff6875b5c51ec4bded235a15d6e06a532b19c4bd6f0f76094896d63d75

transactions were sent and I added blockchain explorer links

Just adding here, it's only for new blocks, so no historic data.

Because there hasn't been a mined block for 11+hrs.

Addlyn, I checked your monthly graph, you last mined on 10th of February, that is one day after the 2nd last block was found, and approx 9 days prior to the last block being found. As you can see, we had a 137% effort or the last block, which under the PPLNS rules means, that some shares outside the 100% effort window get silently dropped and are not rewarded at all. Doing a very rough calculation based on the time, 11 days at 137% effort means that approx 8 days is 100% effort, which leaves the first 3 days of the 10-11 day period of mining to be the expected period from which all the shares are silently dropped. As you can guess now, this is pretty much the definite reason why your shares of mining were dropped and not rewarded, which is perfectly fine and correct under the PPLNS model.

Addlyn, can you tell when did you mine the "another 12 hours" ?

eSurgiao , as Oliver has said, you've been around only for 3 days out of 11, so your share contribution wasn't necessarily the best for an ideal reward distribution, where the distribution of the shares was skewed to those that have been around for the full time, also due to the fact that we've had a higher hashrate for the first half of that period. If the block would have taken us just those 3 days to find, meaning you would have been around for the entire window, your reward would most likely have been around the expected average.

Dave, I understand you are upset, but you are taking it a bit overboard.Oliver has done everything right in handling this situation. He was open about the issue, instead of secretive and he offered a compensation.

Issues/bugs are common in development, and while you're saying you had no issue at the other pool, that does not mean that pool never had an issue before. Someone is always going to be burned because of an issue and if it is going to be
you, then be nice, accept it, raise the issue publicly and be thankful that there is someone on the other end responding to you and trying to resolve it.

A block was found since then and if you were still mining, you should have been paid for it. Also read few posts below where Oliver is asking you to send him your wallet address over email and he is willing to compensate for the not submitted  block.

As to "no one to message or talk to" - what is this forum, bots?

If your miner is reporting submitted shares, it could be just a front end issue. Summoning Oliver...

It's in our interest the pool makes a profit for the one that manages it. No issue with the increase.